Projecting the Market's Reaction to 3 Trump Tariff Scenarios
Whether the president issues deliberate, medium-level or aggressive tariffs, there will be short-term reactions in risk assets and stocks.
You're reading 0 of 1 free page.
Register to read more or Unlock Pro — 50% Off Ends Soon
Apparently, today at 4:00 p.m. ET, we will learn the details about this wave of tariffs.
Treasury Secretary said on Tuesday that this will represent a “cap” on tariffs and basically the starting point of negotiations (we will see if that messaging sticks).
What I think we know:
- Relatively little “negotiating” has occurred, which I believe is not what the administration expected. Other countries are “playing” the president differently than they did during Trump 1.0. It also probably doesn’t help that this time around, there is no “divide and conquer.”
- Other countries are already having conversations about trade, bypassing the U.S. Apparently, Japan, China and South Korea are talking. That makes sense, as the U.S. policy toward Taiwan is unclear and that could dramatically impact South Korea and Japan. Canada and Mexico are apparently having discussions. I’m sure Europe (or some countries within Europe) are having a variety of trade dialogues (it is really, really, really important to notice that they do not want to spend their increased military spending on U.S. equipment — to the extent they can avoid it).
- Other countries are likely going through their tariffs, line by line, estimating which ones they can give in on with minimal impact and which ones are important. Given that the U.S. is fighting with everyone and allegedly still hasn’t finalized its plan, we are likely to not fare well at the granular level.
- The geopolitical actions so far — from NATO, to Russia/Ukraine, to forming the 51st state, to “take” Greenland, etc. — have only added to the questions about dealing with the U.S. that other countries have.
- The U.S. does not have a lot of excess capacity (it will take time to build) and so far, no legislation on the deregulation front.
Deliberate or Thoughtful Tariffs
Risk assets can and should rally in this case. If these sort of tariffs had been the starting point, we could probably move on. But they weren’t and, coupled with the issues listed above, I think the rally will stall.
It will need indications that global tensions with trading partners have eased to reduce. It will be curious to see how his base responds? Will there be any erosion of the aura of “the art of the deal”?
Medium-Level Tariffs
With anything less than 15% to 20% across-the-board tariffs, I expect a slight risk-asset rally (the market seem desperate to rally on certainty), but I think that fades quickly and we drift lower, trading on headlines going forward.
Aggressive Tariffs
This would cause an immediate sell-off in risk assets. Stocks will drop 3% or more quickly with ongoing selling pressure. The 10-year treasury likely breaks 4%.
I hear a lot of chatter that the policies will force the Fed to act. Maybe, but I think the Fed will act late and it will be too small relative to the total revamp of global trade to stop the slide. There were a lot of easier ways to get the Fed to cut — like sticking to “drill baby drill,” reducing regulations (ideally via legislation as opposed to executive orders), etc.
The whole “this is all to get the Fed to cut” is incredibly risky (who knows what was set in motion) and only seems to have gotten traction because Wall Street doesn’t want to believe how much this administration believes in the benefits of tariffs.
Hopefully I will be disappointed and wrong and markets can rally and threats to the global economy can be greatly reduced, but I think once we get beyond debating the tariffs, we will be forced to digest the mess that global trade is in, and that cannot be good for corporate earnings or the economy.
For better or for worse, here is Bloomberg TV on Wednesday morning, where the jet lag worked in my favor as I was up at 3 a.m. anyways.
Should be an interesting few days, to say the least!
At the time of publication, Tchir had no positions in any securities mentioned.
