Conditions Are Ripe for Selling Into a Series of Major Events
A flood of events will soak up liquidity in exactly the sector that needs support.
You've reached your free article limit
You've read 0 of 1 free Pro articles.
Investors are seeing a little positive action on Tuesday morning as the indexes try to build on Monday’s bounce after Friday’s smackdown. Oil is lower, and the focus is shifting to several major catalysts later this week.
Wednesday brings the Consumer Price Index for May, with consensus calling for headline CPI to accelerate to 4.2% year over year. That will be a fresh three-year high and is a worrisome trend. Thursday brings the Producer Price Index. Friday brings the SpaceX IPO.
The primary question is whether those catalysts can put the indexes back on an upward trajectory. That is going to be difficult given two glaring problems: record levels of AI concentration in the indexes, and a coming flood of events that will soak up liquidity in exactly the sector that needs the support.
The AI Concentration Problem
According to the Wall Street Journal, the top 10 stocks in the S&P 500 now account for nearly 40% of the index, the highest level of concentration since 1965. Sixty years ago, the makeup of the top 10 was diversified across sectors. There were oil producers like Exxon Mobil (XOM), Texaco, and Chevron (CVX); chemicals at DuPont (DD); consumer goods at Kodak; autos at General Motors (GM); retail at Sears; telecom at AT&T (T); and tech at IBM (IBM). Investing in just those names would have produced a mediocre return, but the broader market compensated, making the index a good vehicle for generating returns.
The current top ten looks quite different. Alphabet (GOOGL), Apple (AAPL), Nvidia (NVDA), Meta (META), Broadcom (AVGO), Microsoft (MSFT), Amazon (AMZN), Tesla (TSLA), and Micron (MU) all have direct ties to the artificial intelligence theme. The concentration is not just in the math but in the theme.
When the AI trade gets hit, the S&P 500 takes the full force of the move rather than getting cushioned by sector diversification. That is what happened on Friday when chip and AI-related names tumbled, and the index fell 2.4% on what would normally be a more contained drop.
A Change in Market Exposure
Technically, both the Nasdaq and the S&P 500 remain below their 21-day moving averages after undercutting that level on Friday. Based on that action, Investor’s Business Daily lowered its recommended market exposure to 60% to 80% on Friday, which is the first meaningful step down from its aggressive posture that has been in place for most of the year. This is important because it means the buy-the-dip reflex is less likely.
A Week That Tests the Bounce
We start with the CPI Wednesday with a headline announcing a three-year high. PPI Thursday adds another inflation number, and then SpaceX IPOs Friday at a fixed $135, with a valuation likely between $1.5 trillion and $2 trillion, which would make it the largest IPO in history. There will likely be a liquidity drain into that offering as investors free up cash for their new shares. That hits around the same time as two inflation reports that can move yields and the Fed-hike odds higher.
The cumulative weight of these three major events across three sessions will amplify whatever direction the action takes. A hot CPI, a hot PPI, and a SpaceX frenzy that pulls capital out of existing positions is the bear-case scenario. An in-line CPI, an in-line PPI, and a SpaceX listing that goes off without disrupting the broader market is the bull-case scenario. Regardless of the course of events, volatility is likely to increase.
My Strategy
The game plan stays where it has been. I am reducing exposure by trading tightly, using shorter time frames, and being more selective with new buys. The bounce off Friday’s lows is the kind of reflex action that often comes after a sharp washout, but it does not change the underlying picture of record concentration and a series of important catalysts.
The names that work in this environment will be those with their own catalysts and those that did not get caught up in the AI parabolic move. The names that struggle will be the ones that need a broad market bid to extend higher.
Stock picking matters more than directional conviction, and patience matters more than activity. Let the catalysts hit, let the market react, and look for the setups that develop after the noise settles.
At the time of publication, Rev Shark had no positions in any securities mentioned.
